Bad country and good people

Bad country and good people

US President Donald Trump has (allegedly) described some countries as "problematic countries". The comment has caused outrage and many media have called it "racist".

When Donald Trump speaks, it is often not what he says, but how he says it causes outrage. In earlier times, more and more people spoke directly and relevantly. Now they have to spend hours thinking about how to say something that does not offend anyone, and once verbalized that says nothing.

There are countries where women are sexually mutilated - what do you say to a country that allows such a barbaric thing? It is her culture? No one should judge today (unless you are on the approved list of "judgments" and can be described as "fierce criticism of firearms and religion or" bad followers of Donald Trump "or" Teeband ").

A few years ago, Sir Charles Napier from the United Kingdom was horrified when he burned the widow. He has put an end to this. There was no way to rationalize or ask how this would happen in a way that would not offend another culture. They burned innocent women and there was nothing to streamline. He said:
But my nation has a custom too. When men burn living women, we suspend them and confiscate all their possessions. My carpenters have to set up Gibbets, to which everyone involved depends when the widow is consumed.

If Sir Charles Napier said that and did it today, the anchors of CNN would cry because of his insensitivity. They would ignore the widows as well as streamline the treatment of women in many countries of North Africa and the Middle East. All people are created equal. Not all countries and all cultures are.
While all peoples have incredible potential for good and evil, the country or culture in which they live can influence them subtly or directly. That's why people born in the United States are the happiest people in the world. They do not make them better than others, they give them values ??different from those of other countries. People born in countries where corruption and barbarism are the norm internalize these values ??because they are the only ones to know. Of course, some people rebel against these values ??and try to do better.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a person who has rebelled against abusive governments. She was born in Mogadishu, Somalia, fled to Saudi Arabia when her father was imprisoned for opposing the dictatorship in Somalia, then fled to Ethiopia. Her trip took her to Holland and finally to the United States. This heroic woman learned several languages ??and wrote bestsellers along the way. She became an activist against these repressive regimes. She has received awards from Norway and Sweden. She was named European of the Year by Reader's Digest in 2005 and received the Martin Luther Child Jr. Unsung Heroes Award.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali should be an excellent role model and an excellent representative to show what people are in Somalia when they have the opportunity. This should show that the potential for everyone is great despite the opportunities. She was to be sought after at American universities - a successful Somali colorist trying to make the world a better place to put herself in danger. And yet, Brandeis University gave a speech to retain her, as well as an honorary title she was to receive because she felt "anti-Muslim". Here is a woman mutilated by the culture she opposed, and Brandeis called her "anti-Muslim"?

Sir Charles Napier would probably not be invited to Brandeis University either. He would be considered an anti-Hindu. In the United States, you can only criticize American and Western cultures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The media: Do traditional media use slander to control people?

Shamanism and transcendence

The truth about lies in politics