The truth about lies in politics

The truth about lies in politics

Recently, I have heard someone say that once we believe in a belief or a philosophy, our objectivity decreases badly. We no longer try to discern whether something we read or hear is true and correct, we simply accept any information that corroborates our belief. This can be seen in the policy.

Unfortunately, it seems a common practice for politicians and members of Congress to put themselves first, to play political parties, to accept money from lobbyists and big donors in exchange for their votes, while showing little concern for things that are good for our country and taxpayers. When these politicians are set up, try to answer difficult questions or get something wrong or illegal, which is rarely responsible. For too many politicians, the lie seems to be second nature.

The main supporters of many politicians hasten to accept the political leader's assertions as the truth and go forward even when the claim is clearly false. Nowadays, it seems that some voters are more than willing to ignore the lies and dubious behavior of political leaders when they agree with the declared goals of the politician.

Predictably, those who criticize the bad actions of these politicians are quickly identified as enemies and attempts are made to discredit them. Of course, political enemies are always subject to different and often higher standards of conduct on the part of the political leader and his followers. By ignoring the lies, misbehavior, illegal actions and wrongs done by these leaders, supporters say that laws, ethical behavior and poor performance are of no importance as long as they get what they want.
Because truth is truth and lies is a lie, we find every object at the opposite ends of the spectrum.

Lying to:

- Beat and mislead

- Cover something

- Make the truth difficult to find

- Explain false statements or actions

- serve as propaganda

- Support or stay in the wrong

- Hide misuse, error, or illegal activity

- give another bad or guilty expression

- Change Review

- Hide the facts

- forbid something that has been said or done

- Replace the subject less controversial topic

The purpose of truth is:

- reveals and verifies the facts and details

- Be open and honest

- Find exact words, actions, motives, and the nature of people

- we can confirm and be absolutely sure what was said and what happened

Politicians crash into the loopholes and misunderstandings:

- Practice their hiding in secret

Tell the other lie to cover it first

- can not support the details and details of their statements

- Create information and scenarios that prove to be wrong

- divert attention through unjustified and false claims

- Push the plants continuously and grow the seeds of doubt

- Trying to delegate facts that may interfere with the fans

- Accomplish claims and blur small things disproportionately

- Hit those who do not respect their lies

- Use personal attacks to break the dissidents

- Start the caller

- Wait for your friends to support lies by talking and playing

- Use alternative facts and irrational logic

- Tell the untrustworthy sources and accept the incorrect information

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New policies required for public discussion

Image
New policies required for public discussion It does not matter if someone is a passionate supporter of President Trump or who can not agree with him on almost every problem or question, most would agree. We are currently experiencing very different moments in many ways. as just recently! The purpose of this article is not to support anyone, but to try to make America civil again so that Americans start talking to each other instead of meeting each other. We have had periods of considerable political discourse and disagreement, such as the civil rights parades of the 1950s and early 1960s, murders (especially of the 1960s), the anti-war movement of the 1960s, etc. ., presidential candidates, out of the United States, the political norm (as Goldwater and Wallace in the 1960s), the drama of the Nixon era, the Iranian Hostage crisis at the Carter era, the Russian antagonism in the Reagan era, the Clinton issues and the terror controversies of September 11 and the ugliness of racism, whic...
Read more

The media: Do traditional media use slander to control people?

Image
The media: Do traditional media use slander to control people? Before the advent of alternative media, the mainstream media had almost all the control. This meant that it was normal for most people to believe just about anything this source had published. Nowadays, thanks to the alternative media, this source no longer has the same control as in the past. But, while their influence on people has diminished in recent years, it would be a mistake to believe that its source is in danger. Old habits die hard รข € People of all ages are attentive to the mainstream media, just as there are some who are not. What has definitely given life a lifeline is the ease with which a person can consume what they sell using modern technology. As long as someone has a type of device, he can download everything this source says, no matter where it is. It is not necessary for someone to watch television or listen to the radio because it would have been necessary in the past to collect informati...
Read more